United States Third Circuit

The district court did not err in deciding that defendant was not seized for purposes of the Fourth Amendment at the time he consented to the search of his automobile at a traffic stop for speeding.

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/18/2005
• Decided 07/01/2005
• Published 07/01/2005

Judges

• Before:  SLOVITER, AMBRO and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Andrew F. Schneider, Esquire (Argued), Doylestown, PA, Counsel for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Thomas A. Marino, United States Attorney, Theodore B. Smith, III (Argued), Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, Counsel for Appellee.