Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit


Hill v. City of Scranton, 02-3833, 02-3988, 03-1377

The district court erred in dismissing plaintiff-police officer's retaliation claim where he presented enough evidence to raise a dispute of material fact as to whether defendant-city impermissibly targeted him for challenging a city ordinance.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/09/2005
  • Published 06/09/2005

Judges

  • Before:  SLOVITER, NYGAARD and ROTH Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Cynthia L. Pollick, Esquire (Argued), The Employment Law Firm, Pittston, PA, Counsel for Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Joseph G. Ferguson, Esquire (Argued), Rosenn, Jenkins & Greenwald, Scranton, PA, Counsel for Appellees.
Copied to clipboard