United States Third Circuit

Plaintiff's claim, alleging defendant violated the Sherman Act by conspiring to induce government architects to specify its toilet partition product, is dismissed where defendant's conduct was based on safety concerns and was not a restraint of trade.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/23/2004
• Decided 02/09/2005
• Published 02/09/2005

Judges

• Before ROTH, AMBRO and CHERTOFF, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• William E. Jackson (Argued), B. Aaron Schulman, Stites & Harbison, Alexandria, VA, Gerald J. Butler, Scranton, PA, for Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Carl W. Hittinger (Argued), Stevens & Lee, Philadelphia, PA, Walter F. Casper, Jr., Carbondale, PA, for Appellees.