Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit


BRINSON v. VAUGHN, 02-4466, 02-4479

Denial of plaintiff's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is reversed where plaintiff properly alleged facts that raise an inference that the challenged strike of a juror was based on an impermissible ground, pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/08/2005
  • Published 02/08/2005

Judges

  • Before SCIRICA, Chief Judge, ALITO, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Norris E. Gelman (Argued), Philadelphia, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Robert M. Falin (Argued), Assistant District Attorney, Philadelphia, for Appellees.
Copied to clipboard