United States Third Circuit

In an antitrust suit, summary judgment against plaintiff's claim that defendant conspired to fix the prices of flat glass is reversed where there is sufficient evidence in the record to prove that an agreement existed.

Appellate Information

• Argued 06/22/2004
• Decided 09/29/2004
• Published 09/29/2004

Judges

• Before NYGAARD, MCKEE and CHERTOFF, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Samuel Issacharoff, New York, NY, Daniel E. Bacine, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Philadelphia, PA, Eugene Spector, Spector Roseman & Kodroff, Philadelphia, PA, Robert N. Kaplan, (Argued), Richard J. Kilsheimer, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, New York, NY, Michael D. Hausfeld, Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll, Washington, D.C., Robert Skirnick, Meredith Cohen Greenfogel & Skirnick, New York, NY, for Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Paul M. Dodyk, (Argued), Peter T. Barbur, Lawrence E. Buterman, Kelly A. Rocco, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York, NY, David J. Armstrong, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellee PPG Industries, Inc., J. Michael Murray, (Argued), Berkman, Gordon, Murray & DeVan, Cleveland, OH, for Appellee Edward Bryant., Michael S. Sommer, McDermott, Will & Emery, New York, NY, Elliot Silverman, (Argued), McDermott, Will & Emery, Irvine, CA, for Appellee Ronald W. Skeddle.