United States Third Circuit
EICHENLAUB v. TOWNSHIP OF INDIANA, 03-2707
In a suit over defendant-Township's insistence that plaintiff's property development comply with a number of its regulations, the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation, equal protection, and writ of mandamus claims is reversed.
Appellate Information
- Argued 03/26/2004
- Decided 09/21/2004
- Published 09/21/2004
Judges
- CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge., Before AMBRO, CHERTOFF, and BECKER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Blaine A. Lucas (Argued), Gerri L. Sperling, Springer Bush & Perry P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Scott G. Dunlop (Argued), Stephen J. Poljak, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellees, except for Dorothy T. Claus., Jeffrey Cohen (Argued), Mark A. Eck, Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebeneck & Eck, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellee, Dorothy T. Claus.