Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit


PRIESTER v. VAUGHN, 03-2956

Defendant's murder conviction is affirmed over his challenges that 1) the district court erred in concluding that the admission of a redacted statement comported with the requirements of the Sixth Amendment and 2) counsel's failure to object to an accomplice liability instruction constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 05/04/2004
  • Decided 08/19/2004
  • Published 08/19/2004

Judges

  • Before SLOVITER, FUENTES and BECKER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Johanna E. Markind (Argued), Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Thomas W. Dolgenos (Argued), Chief, Federal Litigation, Ronald Eisenberg, Deputy District Attorney, Law Division, Arnold H. Gordon, First Assistant District Attorney, Lynne Abraham, District Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.
Copied to clipboard