United States Third Circuit

The district court's order to enjoin defendant from enforcing a zoning enforcement notice, that would have resulted in the eviction of plaintiffs, is reversed because plaintiffs' leases were not a protectible property interest, and, as a result, they were not afforded a constitutional guarantee of notice before their leases were terminated.

Appellate Information

• Argued 12/15/2003
• Decided 07/26/2004
• Published 07/26/2004

Judges

• McKEE, Circuit Judge., Before ROTH, McKEE, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Arthur W. Lefco, (Argued), James W. Gicking, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Robert F. Salvin, (Argued), Community Impact Legal Services, Inc., Chester, PA, for Appellees.