United States Third Circuit
SPRUILL v. GILLIS, 02-2659
Plaintiff inmate's suit claiming Eight Amendment and civil rights violations stemming from defendants' alleged deliberate indifference toward the plaintiff's medical condition was sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss despite defendants' objections under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/13/2004
- Decided 06/18/2004
- Published 06/18/2004
Judges
- BECKER, Circuit Judge., Before ALITO, CHERTOFF, and BECKER Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Eric R. Sonnenschein (Argued), Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Michael A. Farnan (Argued), Department of Corrections, Office of Chief Counsel, Camp Hill, PA, for Appellees Gillis and Goolier., Alan S. Gold (Argued), Sean Robins, Gold, Butkovitz & Robins, Elkins Park, PA, for Appellees McGlaughlin and Brown.