United States Third Circuit

In an appeal of the denial of plaintiff's Supplemental Security Income claim, court found the hypothetical question posed to an expert by the ALJ did not adequately reflect all of the plaintiff's limitations, and therefore, the ALJ's decision was not based on substantial evidence.

Appellate Information

• Argued 04/20/2004
• Decided 06/18/2004
• Published 06/18/2004

Judges

• Before SCIRICA, Chief Judge, GARTH, and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Thomas D. Sutton (argued), Leventhal & Sutton, Langhorne, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• David F. Chermol (argued), Social Security Administration, OGC/Region III, Philadelphia, for Appellee.