Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit


US v. CARTWRIGHT, 03-1466

Evidence adduced at trial did not support an inference that defendant knew he was participating in a transaction that involved a controlled substance, rather than some other form of contraband, such as stolen jewels or computer chips or currency. Drug convictions are reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment of acquittal.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/26/2004
  • Decided 03/01/2004
  • Published 03/01/2004

Judges

  • Before NYGAARD, FUENTES and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Maureen Kearney Rowley, Chief Federal Defender, David L. McColgin (Argued), Assistant Federal Defender, Philadelphia, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Patrick L. Meehan, United States Attorney, Laurie Magid, Deputy U.S. Attorney, Robert A. Zauzmer, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kenya S. Mann (Argued), Assistant U.S. Attorney, Philadelphia, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard