United States Third Circuit
US v. CARTWRIGHT, 03-1466
Evidence adduced at trial did not support an inference that defendant knew he was participating in a transaction that involved a controlled substance, rather than some other form of contraband, such as stolen jewels or computer chips or currency. Drug convictions are reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment of acquittal.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/26/2004
- Decided 03/01/2004
- Published 03/01/2004
Judges
- Before NYGAARD, FUENTES and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Maureen Kearney Rowley, Chief Federal Defender, David L. McColgin (Argued), Assistant Federal Defender, Philadelphia, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Patrick L. Meehan, United States Attorney, Laurie Magid, Deputy U.S. Attorney, Robert A. Zauzmer, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kenya S. Mann (Argued), Assistant U.S. Attorney, Philadelphia, for Appellee.