United States Third Circuit
US v. D-AMARIO, 02-2371, 02-3250
To the extent that the district court suggested that a departure was warranted because of the paucity of prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. section 115(a)(1)(B) for threatening a federal official, the Court committed both legal and factual error and thus the case is remanded for the sole purpose of imposing a sentence within the range previously found by the District Court to be applicable.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/02/2003
- Decided 11/20/2003
- Published 11/20/2003
Judges
- Before: ALITO, ROTH, and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Christopher J. Christie, United States Attorney, George S. Leone, Chief, Appeals Division, Deborah L. Goldklang (Argued), Newark, NJ, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Lori M. Koch (Argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Camden, NJ, for Appellee.