United States Third Circuit

In a securities fraud class action, "work product" of a non-testifying trial consultant in this case is privileged and subject to only limited discovery.

Appellate Information

• Argued 04/24/2003
• Decided 09/16/2003
• Published 09/16/2003

Judges

• Before SCIRICA, Chief Judge,AMBRO and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Alan N. Salpeter, (Argued), Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Chicago, IL, Douglas S. Eakeley, Lowenstein Sandler PC, Roseland, NJ, for Appellant, Ernst & Young LLP.


• For Appellees:
  
• Gregory L. Diskant, (Argued), Robert P. LoBue, Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York, NY, for Appellee, Cendant Corporation., Herbert J. Stern, (Argued), Stern, Greenberg & Kilcullen, Roseland, NJ, for Appellees, James E. Buckman, Leonard S. Coleman, Jr., Christel DeHaan, Martin L. Edelman, Scott E. Forbes, Stephen P. Holmes, Robert D. Kunisch, Michael P. Monaco, Brian Mulroney, Robert E. Nederlander, Robert W. Pittman, E. John Rosenwald, Leonard Schutzman, Henry R. Silverman, Robert F. Smith and John D. Snodgrass., Daniel L. Berger, Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossmann, New York, NY, for Appellees, California Public Employees' Retirement System, New York State Common Retirement Fund, New York City Pension Funds., Andrew Entwistle, Entwistle & Cappucci, New York, NY, for Appellee, State Board of Administration of Florida.