United States Third Circuit

An ordinance, which purportedly fails to provide a "fair share" of township land for telecommunications uses, is neither de jure nor de facto exclusionary. The existence of a significant gap in telecomm service need not include the data from the applicant provider.

Appellate Information

• Argued 12/19/2002
• Decided 06/05/2003
• Published 06/05/2003

Judges

• Before SLOVITER, MCKEE, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Paul J. Lawrence (Argued), Jay Carlson, Preston, Gates & Ellis, Seattle, James C. Dalton, Christopher H. Schubert, Riley, Riper, Hollin & Colagreco, Paoli, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Andrew D.H. Rau (Argued), Unruh, Turner, Burke & Frees, West Chester, John S. Halsted, Gawthrop, Greenwood & Halsted, West Chester, Paola Tripodi Kaczynski, Holsten & Associates, Media, for Appellee.