Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Third Circuit


AES CORP. v. DOW CHEM. CO., 01-3373

Non-reliance clauses in documents relating to transactions in which plaintiff acquired the stock of defendant's subsidiary did not render plaintiff's reliance on alleged misrepresentations unreasonable as a matter of federal law, but clauses are a factor to consider.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 05/23/2002
  • Decided 04/14/2003
  • Published 04/14/2003

Judges

  • Before McKEE, STAPLETON and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Dennis E. Glazer,James W.B. Benkard (Argued), Frances E. Bivens, Davis, Polk & Wardwell, New York, and Michael D. Goldman, Stephen C. Norman, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Herbert L. Zarov, Michele L. Odorizzi (Argued), Daniel J. Delaney, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Chicago, and David C. McBride, John W. Shaw, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard