United States Third Circuit
CARRASCA v. POMEROY, 02-1127
In a civil rights action arising from racial profiling in detentions and arrests, the district court failed to view factual disputes in a light most favorable to plaintiffs, and thus erred in granting summary judgment to park rangers based on qualified immunity and the merits.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/17/2002
- Published 12/23/2002
Judges
- Before SLOVITER, RENDELL, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Daniel Werner (Argued), Patricia C. Kakalec, Farmworker Legal Services of New York, Inc., New Paltz, NY, for Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Robert P. Shane (Argued), Deputy Attorney General, Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General, David Samson, Attorney General of New Jersey, Office of Attorney General of New Jersey, Department of Law & Public Safety, Trenton, NJ, for Appellees.