Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

MARSHALL v. HENDRICKS, 00-9004

The district court erred in concluding that the state's application of Strickland was reasonable, without conducting an evidentiary hearing to explore a habeas petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 03/21/2002
  • Decided 09/11/2002
  • Published 09/11/2002

Judges

  • Before:  BECKER, Chief Judge, ROTH and RENDELL, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Stephen W. Kirsch [Argued], Office of Public Defender, Richard J. HughesJustice Complex, Trenton, NJ, Counsel for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Robert E. Bonpietro [Argued], Office of Attorney General of New Jersey, Department of Law & Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice, Richard J. HughesJustice Complex, Trenton, NJ, Counsel for Appellees.
Copied to clipboard