United States Third Circuit

In a trademark action, 1) an expert was qualified to testify on likelihood of confusion, based on his practical experience, and 2) admission of evidence of trademark registration in foreign countries was proper, and 3) cancellation of mark registration did not constitute newly-discovered evidence justifying relief from judgment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/13/2002
• Published 08/15/2002

Judges

• BEFORE:  NYGAARD, ALITO, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Antoinette R. Stone (argued), Ellen E. Farina, Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Michael L. Dever, Bryan H. Opalko, Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Mark Schonfeld (argued), Hillel I. Parness, Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner, LLP, New York, NY, for appellee.