Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit


GLENN DISTRIB. CORP. v. CARLISLE PLASTICS, INC., 00-2710/90

Specification of quantities in a contract, while also informing the buyer that quantities were "subject to change," rendered a contract ambiguous under Pennsylvania law. Award of lost profits was proper where breaching seller did not show that the buyer's efforts to cover were unreasonable.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/24/2002
  • Published 07/25/2002

Judges

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard