Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Third Circuit


CRISSMAN v. DOVER DOWNS ENTM'T, 00-5178

The regulation and flow of funds of defendant race track, a private corporation, by the state of Delaware do not support the conclusion that the state is responsible for plaintiff's exclusion from the track.

Appellate Information

  • Argued Array
  • Decided 04/30/2002
  • Published 04/30/2002

Judges

  • BEFORE:  McKEE, ROSENN and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges., BEFORE:  BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN,SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, McKEE, RENDELL, BARRY, FUENTES, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Noel E. Primos,Jeffrey J. Clark [Argued], Schmittinger & Rodriguez, Dover, DE, for Appellants, Charles Crissman, Wendy Crissman.

  • For Appellees:
  • Thomas P. Preston [Argued], Reed Smith, Wilmington, DE, for Appellees, Dover Downs Entertainment Inc., Dover Downs, Inc., James F. Burnett, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE, for Amicus-Appellees, Thoroughbred Racing Associations of North America, Inc., DE Racing Assoc., Frederick J. Martin, Bleakley, Platt & Schmidt, White Plains, NY, for Amicus-Appellees, Harness Tracks of America.
Copied to clipboard