United States Third Circuit
CRISSMAN v. DOVER DOWNS ENTM'T, 00-5178
The regulation and flow of funds of defendant race track, a private corporation, by the state of Delaware do not support the conclusion that the state is responsible for plaintiff's exclusion from the track.
Appellate Information
- Argued Array
- Decided 04/30/2002
- Published 04/30/2002
Judges
- BEFORE: McKEE, ROSENN and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges., BEFORE: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN,SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, McKEE, RENDELL, BARRY, FUENTES, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Noel E. Primos,Jeffrey J. Clark [Argued], Schmittinger & Rodriguez, Dover, DE, for Appellants, Charles Crissman, Wendy Crissman.
- For Appellees:
- Thomas P. Preston [Argued], Reed Smith, Wilmington, DE, for Appellees, Dover Downs Entertainment Inc., Dover Downs, Inc., James F. Burnett, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE, for Amicus-Appellees, Thoroughbred Racing Associations of North America, Inc., DE Racing Assoc., Frederick J. Martin, Bleakley, Platt & Schmidt, White Plains, NY, for Amicus-Appellees, Harness Tracks of America.