United States Third Circuit

Applying the Supreme Court decision in Green Tree Financial Corp. Alabama v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79 (2000), where a district court holds every one of a plaintiff's claims to be arbitrable, and dismisses them without prejudice and without retaining jurisdiction over any claims, because there is "nothing more for the court to do but execute the judgment," the district court's order falls within the Supreme Court's definition of an appealable final order.

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/01/2001
• Decided 03/13/2002
• Published 03/13/2002

Judges

• Before: SLOVITER, NYGAARD and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Martha Sperling,Silver & Sperling, Doylestown, PA, Ralph E. Lamar, IV (Argued), Doylestown, PA, for Appellant., Elisabeth S. Shuster, Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, Harrisburg, PA, for Amicus-Appellant Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission., Robert J. Gregory (Argued), Senior Attorney, Gwendolyn Young Reams, Associate General Counsel, Philip B. Sklover, Associate General Counsel, Lorraine C. Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, D.C., for Amicus-Appellant Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.


• For Appellees:
  
• Thomas J. Barton (Argued), James G. Fannon, Drinker, Biddle & Reath, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.