Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Third Circuit


ZAHL v. HARPER, 01-1817

Where a plaintiff seeks to enjoin a state administrative action, which concerns only the state's regulation of its physicians' licensing and behavior, and alleges that such an action is preempted by an Act of Congress, he raises a Constitutional challenge to the state action under the Supremacy Clause, and abstention is appropriate.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/26/2002
  • Published 02/26/2002

Judges

  • Before SCIRICA, ROSENN, Circuit Judges, and KANE, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Robert J. Conroy,Kern, Augustine, Conroy & Schoppmann, Bridgewater, NJ, Counsel for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Jeffrey Burstein, Office of Attorney General of New Jersey, Division of Law, Newark, NJ, Counsel for Appellees.
Copied to clipboard