United States Third Circuit
ZAHL v. HARPER, 01-1817
Where a plaintiff seeks to enjoin a state administrative action, which concerns only the state's regulation of its physicians' licensing and behavior, and alleges that such an action is preempted by an Act of Congress, he raises a Constitutional challenge to the state action under the Supremacy Clause, and abstention is appropriate.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/26/2002
- Published 02/26/2002
Judges
- Before SCIRICA, ROSENN, Circuit Judges, and KANE, District Judge.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Robert J. Conroy,Kern, Augustine, Conroy & Schoppmann, Bridgewater, NJ, Counsel for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Jeffrey Burstein, Office of Attorney General of New Jersey, Division of Law, Newark, NJ, Counsel for Appellees.