Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

LEPAGE'S INC. v. 3M (MINNESOTA MINING & MFG. CO.), 00-1368, 00-1473

Under section 2 of the Sherman Act, the bundling of competitive product with a noncompetitive product will not support a monopolization claim where neither product is sold below its cost.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 07/12/2001
  • Decided 01/14/2002
  • Published 01/14/2002


  • Argued July 12, 2001., BEFORE: SLOVITER, ALITO, and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges., Reargued En Banc Oct. 30, 2002., BEFORE: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, McKEE, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges., Filed March 25, 2003


  • United States Third Circuit


  • For Appellees:
  • Barbara W. Mather,Jeremy Heep, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Peter Hearn, Peter Hearn, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Mark W. Ryan, Kerry Lynn Edwards, Donald M. Falk, Robert L. Bronston, David A.J. Goldfine, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Washington, DC, Roy T. Englert, Jr. (Argued), Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck & Untereiner, Washington, DC, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants., M. Laurence Popofsky (Argued), Stephen V. Bomse, Paul Alexander, Marie L. Fiala, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, CA, John G. Harkins, Jr., Harkins Cunningham, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard