United States Third Circuit
CHONG v. DIST. DIR., IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERV., 00-1428
Once an alien has had a chance during a removal proceeding to offer evidence and raise arguments on the issue of whether her drug convictions constitute "particularly serious crimes", due process does not require a second hearing before the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Appellate Information
- Argued 12/01/2000
- Decided 09/05/2001
- Published 09/05/2001
Judges
- Before BECKER, Chief Judge, RENDELL, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Stanley H. Wallenstein (Argued), New York, NY, Counsel for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- John M. McAdams, Jr. (Argued), David W. Ogden, Assistant Attorney General, Terri Jane Scadron, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Counsel for Appellee.