Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Third Circuit


EINHORN v. FLEMING FOODS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., 00-2549

Although a literal interpretation of a provision in a collective bargaining agreement may be reasonable, if another interpretation is also reasonable, the language is ambiguous and summary judgment is not appropriate.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 03/07/2001
  • Decided 07/17/2001
  • Published 07/17/2001

Judges

  • Before ALITO, McKEE, Circuit Judges, and KRAVITCH, Senior Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Frank C. Sabatino (argued), James D. Crawford, Jonathan R. Nadler, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Jeanne L. Bakker (argued), Howard J. Bashman, Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard