United States Third Circuit
EINHORN v. FLEMING FOODS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., 00-2549
Although a literal interpretation of a provision in a collective bargaining agreement may be reasonable, if another interpretation is also reasonable, the language is ambiguous and summary judgment is not appropriate.
Appellate Information
- Argued 03/07/2001
- Decided 07/17/2001
- Published 07/17/2001
Judges
- Before ALITO, McKEE, Circuit Judges, and KRAVITCH, Senior Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Frank C. Sabatino (argued), James D. Crawford, Jonathan R. Nadler, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Jeanne L. Bakker (argued), Howard J. Bashman, Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellee.