United States Third Circuit
SOLIS v. US, 99-5833
Where a habeas petitioner asserting inadequacy of counsel alleges that he directed his attorney to take a direct appeal, but counsel did not, 28 USC 2255 requires an evidentiary hearing to determine whether he requested or reasonably demonstrated to counsel a desire to appeal.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/04/2001
- Decided 06/05/2001
- Published 06/05/2001
Judges
- Before: SCIRICA, ROSENN, and GIBSON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- For the United States: Robert J. Cleary, United States Attorney, George S. Leone, Chief, Appeals Division, Norman Gross, Assistant United States Attorney, Camden, NJ., For Appellant Julio Solis: Thomas F. Dorn, Jr., c/o Sinins & Bross, Newark, NJ.