United States Third Circuit

Pennsylvania law requires courts to determine whether a law actually excludes lawful activity before finding the law to be unconstitutional, even though aesthetic reasons alone are not substantial evidence for purposes of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 USC 332(c)(7)(B)(iii).

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/07/2000
• Decided 04/25/2001
• Published 04/25/2001

Judges

• Before ROTH, RENDELL and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• John S. Halsted,Andrew D.H. Rau (Argued), Gawthrop, Greenwood & Halsted, West Chester, PA, and Paola T. Kaczynski (Argued), Holsten & Associates, Media, PA, Attorneys for Appellants/Cross Appellees., James C. Dalton, Riley, Riper, Hollin & Colagreco, Paoli, PA, and Christopher H. Schubert (Argued), Riley, Riper, Hollin & Colagrego, Exton, PA, Attorneys for Appellee/Cross Appellant.