United States Third Circuit

Whether plaintiffs should have obtained a stay under 11 USC 363(m) before appealing an assumption and an assignment under 11 USC 365 is a moot issue until the district court determines the effect, if any, vacating or modifying the assumption and assignment order would have on the sale of plaintiff's site of employment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/25/2001
• Published 04/25/2001

Judges

• Before:  SLOVITER, SCIRICA and ALITO, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• William H. Schorling, (Argued), Philadelphia, PA, Edwin L. Klett, Klett, Rooney, Lieber & Schorling, Pittsburgh, PA, Attorneys for Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• David I. Swan, (Argued), Mark E. Freedlander, McGuireWoods, Pittsburgh, PA, Attorneys for Appellee, William J. Scharffenberger, Chapter 11 Trustee, et al., John P. Edgar, (Argued), Gary P. Nelson, Sherrard, German & Kelly, Pittsburgh, PA, Attorneys for Appellees, Allegheny General Hospital;  Western Pennsylvania Healthcare System, Inc.