United States Third Circuit
DIXON TICONDEROGA CO. v. ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. O'CONNOR, 99-6054, 99-6055, 99-6056
Where a lawyer and putative client had a preexisting relationship involving a related matter, and the lawyer had given the putative client legal advice previously, a promise to discuss a matter at some point in the future may create a lawyer/client relationship.
Appellate Information
- Argued 02/06/2001
- Decided 04/23/2001
- Published 04/24/2001
Judges
- Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, AMBRO and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Steven J. Engelmyer, (Argued), Lisa E. Brody, Heather R. Weiss, Kleinbard, Bell & Brecker, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Dixon Ticonderoga., Andrew M. Epstein, (Argued), Lampf, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow, West Orange, NJ, Counsel for Harold Friedman., Richard T. Garofalo, (Argued), Thomas D. Flinn, Garrity, Graham, Favetta & Flinn, Montclair, NJ, Counsel for Franzblau Dratch., Peter DeSalvo, Jr., (Argued), Soriano, Henkel, Salerno, Biehl & Matthews, Roseland, NJ, Counsel for Estate of William F. O'Connor; Schumann Hession Kennelly & Dorment; Schumann Hanlon & Panepinto; Schumann Hanlon O'Connor and McCrossin.