Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Third Circuit


PRYZBOWKSI v. US HEALTHCARE, INC., 99-5920

A claim that a HMO delayed providing benefits considers the administration of benefits, rather than the quality of medical treatment performed, so ERISA completely preempts such a claim.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/27/2001
  • Published 03/27/2001

Judges

  • Before SLOVITER, AMBRO and WEIS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jerrold D. Goldstein (Argued), North Plainfield, NJ, Attorneys for Appellant., Edward S. Wardell (Argued), Kelley, Wardell & Craig, Haddonfield, NJ, Attorney for U.S. Healthcare, Inc., Melvin Greenberg (Argued), Greenberg, Dauber Epstein & Tucker, Newark, NJ, Attorney for Medemerge, P.A., John Pilla, M.D., Carol E. Sgambelluri, M.D., and Kent R. Ellis, M.D.

  • For Appellees:
  • Herbert J. Stern, Stern & Greenberg, Roseland, NJ, Attorney for Amicus Curiae Appellee The Medical Society of New Jersey.
Copied to clipboard