United States Third Circuit

District Court did not commit reversible error by excluding parol evidence of one party's understanding of "best efforts" in the parties' agreement to market its products where the agreement was fully integrated, and admission of such evidence would result in an illogical conclusion.

Appellate Information

• Argued 12/04/2000
• Decided 01/23/2001
• Published 01/23/2001

Judges

• Before: McKEE, ROSENN, and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Peter J. Mooney (Argued), White and Williams LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellant/Cross-Appellee., James J. Rodgers (Argued), Christie M. Callahan, Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish and Kauffman, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellees/Cross-Appellant.