Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Third Circuit


RILEY v. TAYLOR, 98-9009

In striking three African Americans from jury panel, prosecution did not violate prohibition against race-based peremptory challenges of jurors under Batson v. Kentucky where district court found each of the prosecution's strikes to be race-neutral, or unrelated to race.

Appellate Information

  • Argued Array
  • Decided 01/17/2001
  • Published 01/17/2001

Judges

  • Before:  SLOVITER, ALITO and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.   Before:  BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, McKEE, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES, and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Thomas J. Allingham, II, (Argued), Stephen D. Dargitz, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Mary M. MaloneyHuss Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, Lawrence J. Connell, Widener University School of Law, Wilmington, DE, Attorneys for Appellant James W. Riley.

  • For Appellees:
  • Loren C. Meyers, (Argued), Chief of Appeals Division, William E. Molchen, II, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE, Attorney for Appellees Stanley Taylor and M. Jane Brady.
Copied to clipboard