United States Third Circuit
RILEY v. TAYLOR, 98-9009
In striking three African Americans from jury panel, prosecution did not violate prohibition against race-based peremptory challenges of jurors under Batson v. Kentucky where district court found each of the prosecution's strikes to be race-neutral, or unrelated to race.
Appellate Information
- Argued Array
- Decided 01/17/2001
- Published 01/17/2001
Judges
- Before: SLOVITER, ALITO and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges. Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, McKEE, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES, and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Thomas J. Allingham, II, (Argued), Stephen D. Dargitz, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Mary M. MaloneyHuss Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, Lawrence J. Connell, Widener University School of Law, Wilmington, DE, Attorneys for Appellant James W. Riley.
- For Appellees:
- Loren C. Meyers, (Argued), Chief of Appeals Division, William E. Molchen, II, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE, Attorney for Appellees Stanley Taylor and M. Jane Brady.