United States Third Circuit

There is no basis for sentencing reversal when the methodology employed by the district court in sentencing defendant -- methodology in conformity with current case law -- lacked an "error [which was] clear under current law."

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/29/2000
• Decided 01/10/2001
• Published 01/10/2001

Judges

• Before ALITO and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges, and POLLAK, District Judge.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Thomas R. Valen (Argued), Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, Newark, NJ, Attorneys for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Vincent Giblin (Argued), George S. Leone, United States Attorneys Office, Newark, NJ, Attorneys for Appellee.