Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Third Circuit


WATSON v. EASTMAN KODAK CO., 99-3520

The relevant date from which to measure the timeliness of employee's discrimination claim is the date when he was removed from his position, and the mere speculative possibility of continued employment does not alter the date of notification rule stated in Delaware State College v. Ricks.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 10/24/2000
  • Decided 12/21/2000
  • Published 12/21/2000

Judges

  • Before:  BECKER, Chief Judge, SCIRICA and FUENTES, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Neal A. Sanders (argued), Law Offices of Neal Alan Sanders, Butler, PA, Attorneys for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael A. Fitzhugh (argued), Fitzhugh & Associates, Boston, MA, Attorneys for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard