United States Third Circuit

Prosecutor's questioning of defendant before the grand jury on perjury charge under 18 USC 1623 was unambiguous, not impermissibly vague, and the District Court's dismissal of a portion of the indictment does not require dismissal of the rest of the indictment.

Appellate Information

• Argued 07/20/2000
• Decided 11/28/2000
• Published 11/30/2000

Judges

• Before:  RENDELL and ROSENN, Circuit Judges, and O'NEILL, Senior District Judge.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Bruce Brandler, [Argued], Office of U.S. Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, Counsel for Appellee/Cross-Appellant United States of America., Sal Cognetti, Jr., [Argued], Foley, Cognetti, Comerford & Cimini, Scranton, PA;  and Daniel T. Brier, Donna A. Walsh, Myers, Brier & Kelly, Scranton, PA, Counsel for Appellant/Cross-Appellee Frank Serafini.