United States Second Circuit
Kayheem Lilly v. The City of New York, et al. , 17-2823
Affirmed in part. Due to the case’s simplicity, the district court’s decision to reduce Lilly’s attorney’s “reasonable hourly rate” is affirmed. Fees related to the fee application are vacated because Rule 68 only allows for fees incurred up to the date of the settlement offer.
- Published 2019/08/14
- United States Second Circuit