Skip to main content

United States Second Circuit

Cho v. City of New York, 18-337

Revived four plaintiffs' claims that city officials coerced them into signing settlement agreements waiving various constitutional rights in order to avoid eviction under a nuisance abatement ordinance. Held that the district court erred in concluding that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Vacated a dismissal and remanded.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2018/12/11


  • Lynch


  • United States Second Circuit


Copied to clipboard