United States Second Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

Biro v. Conde Nast, 14-3815

In a defamation action arising from a New Yorker article concerning plaintiff's fingerprint analysis art authentication work, the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's claims is affirmed where F.R.C.P. Rule 8 requires that a limited-purpose public figure bringing a defamation suit to plead sufficient facts to make allegations of actual malice plausible.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2015/12/08




  • United States Second Circuit


FindLaw Career Center

    Select a Job Title

      Post a Job  |  Careers Home

    View More