United States Second Circuit
Sherman v. Town of Chester, 13-1503
Dismissal of plaintiff's complaint alleging that defendant-town engaged in delay tactics preventing a decision on plaintiff's application for a subdivision approval is: 1) reversed in part as to plaintiff's takings claim which is ripe, because seeking a final decision from defendant-town would be futile because defendant-town used unfair and repetitive procedures to avoid a final decision, and plaintiff adequately alleged a taking; 2) vacated in part and remanded, with regard to plaintiff's federal non-takings claims and state law claims; but 3) affirmed in part, where the remaining claims were properly dismissed.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/16/2014
- Published 05/16/2014
Judges
- STRAUB
Court
- United States Second Circuit