United States Second Circuit
Schlessinger v. Valspar Corporation, 11-4430
Dismissal of plaintiff's complaint alleging a cause of action for violating New York General Business Law section 395-a, which governs termination of maintenance agreements, is affirmed, where the New York Court of Appeals has responded to the certified questions as follows: 1) General Business Law section 395-a does not make contract clauses that contradict its terms null and void; and 2) violation of section 395-a alone does not give rise to a cause of action under General Business Law section 349.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/24/2013
- Published 07/24/2013
Judges
- PER CURIAM
Court
- United States Second Circuit