Judgment convicting defendants on various counts including murder, mail fraud, and murder in aid of racketeering, and imposing mandatory life sentences is affirmed, where: 1) there was no error in the admission of an autopsy report and a toxicology report without the presence of the individuals who prepared those reports inasmuch as they were not testimonial statements because they were not made with the primary purpose of creating a record for use at a criminal trial, and therefore did not require that the defendants have the opportunity to confront the authors of the reports; and 2) defendants' additional multiple claims of error fail.