United States Second Circuit

The district court did not err in denying plaintiff's motions to set aside the verdict, or for a new trial, because there were sufficient facts for a reasonable jury to conclude that she failed to prove that the shooting of her dog by police, while executing a "no-knock" search warrant of her home, was an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/12/2013
• Published 03/12/2013

Judges

• PER CURIAM

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel