In 1983 action against defendant town and officials alleging deprivation of procedural due process and free speech rights when plaintiff' position was reduced from full to part time and not reappointed as the town's Building Official after he made statements regarding the use of wood-burning stoves, judgment for plaintiff is reversed and remanded, where: 1) defendant Black was entitled to qualified immunity as to plaintiff's procedural due process claim, because plaintiff did not adequately allege that he had a constitutionally protected property right in full-time employment; and 2) defendant officials were entitled to qualified immunity as to plaintiff's claim under the First Amendment, because plaintiff did not adequately allege that he spoke in his capacity as a private citizen.