Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Second Circuit


US v. Lyttle, 09-5195

In a prosecution for numerous offenses relating to the defendant's involvement in a fraudulent high-yield investment program, before which the district court had granted a government application to suspend the statute of limitations pursuant to 18 USC section 3292 while the government sought the assistance of the Hungarian government in recovering records relating to transfers of the scheme’s proceeds into Hungarian bank accounts, the district court's denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment on statute of limitations grounds is affirmed, where: 1) the evidence was sufficient to support the district court’s order; 2) section 3292 does not require that the foreign evidence sought be necessary for an indictment, nor that it be obtainable only through an official request to a foreign government; and 3) district courts may rely on ex parte proceedings when deciding to issue section 3292 orders.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/01/2012
  • Published 02/01/2012

Judges

  • Livingston

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Mark D. Hosken, Bradley E. Tyler

Copied to clipboard