United States Second Circuit

In a case seeking civil in rem forfeiture, pursuant to 22 U.S.C. Section 401(a), of certain communication-jamming devices that the owner was charged with illegally attempting to export, the district court's judgment ordering forfeiture is affirmed where: 1) the claimant's stipulation not to contest forfeiture in exchange for dismissal of a criminal complaint was enforceable; and 2) the claimant lacked Article III standing to oppose the forfeiture because it could not cause him injury.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/22/2011
• Published 12/22/2011

Judges

• Kearse

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Jesse M. Furman,