In a trademark and unfair competition dispute, judgment of the district court is affirmed where the court correctly: 1) instructed the jury; 2) refused to grant a new trial on the issue of whether defendant made fraudulent statements to the Patent and Trademark Office, as well as its refusal to vacate the jury's verdict that plaintiff did not fraudulently obtain its trademark registrations; 3) refused to reinstate defendant's trademark registration and its cancellation of plaintiff's trademark registrations; and 4) denied attorneys' fees and injunctive relief.