United States Second Circuit

In an action alleging that defendant-town, through its town supervisor and other policy-making officials, maintained an official policy under which the plaintiffs were denied the right to develop their property, and subsequently retaliated against for their exercise of their First Amendment rights, a district court's order denying post-verdict interest is vacated where, if a mandate reinstating a jury verdict does not order entry of a judgment in a specific dollar amount, and also makes no mention of interest, the district court retains the power to award post-verdict interest on remand.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/08/2010
• Published 09/08/2010

Judges

• Array

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David O. Wright, Ralph F. Schoene