Skip to main content

United States Second Circuit


US v. Shyne, 08-0865

Defendants' convictions for conspiracy to commit bank fraud and money laundering are affirmed where the district court's order denying defendants' application to require government production of all written or recorded statements, including comprehensive notes from proffer sessions, of coconspirators who would not be testifying at trial but whose statements the government intended to introduce at trial as statements made in furtherance of the conspiracy was proper because the disclosure requirements of the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. section 3500, did not apply to non-testifying declarants.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/05/2010
  • Published 08/05/2010

Judges

  • Array

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Richard D. Willstatter, Daniel W. Levy

Copied to clipboard