United States Second Circuit

In an insurance fraud prosecution, the district court's amended restitution order is affirmed where the provisions of the governing statute in this case, the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, were complied with because, inter alia, the restitution order was imposed at the time that defendant was resentenced following the court of appeals' remand, and defendant did not show that she was prejudiced by the lapse of time preceding resentencing.

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/18/2009
• Decided 01/28/2010
• Published 01/28/2010

Judges

• PER CURIAM:, Before KEARSE, CABRANES, and STRAUB, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Richard Ware Levitt, Levitt & Kaizer, New York, NY, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Jesse M. Furman, Assistant United States Attorney (Rebecca A. Rohr, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel) Lev L. Dassin, Acting United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Appellee.