United States Second Circuit
SEC v. DiBella, 08-1673
In an action by the SEC seeking civil penalties for securities fraud, judgment for plaintiff is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that, at the time of the transaction at issue, the government official whose fraud defendants allegedly abetted was a fiduciary with respect to the transaction; 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the fee paid to one defendant as part of that transaction was material; and 3) there was substantial evidence that defendant knowingly aided and abetted the official in violating section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/25/2009
- Published 11/25/2009
Judges
- Before: MINER, WESLEY, Circuit Judges, and STANCEU, Judge.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- James A. Wade, (William J. Kelleher, III, Thomas J. Donlon, on the brief), Robinson & Cole LLP, Stamford, CT, for Defendants-Appellants., Luis de la Torre, Senior Litigation Counsel (Jacob H. Stillman, Solicitor, on the brief), for Andrew N. Vollmer, Acting General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.